To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Th
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Hi all
I'd like to prepare the release of commons-logging 1.1.1. The release
will be done entirely with Maven 2. Since this is fairly new for
Commons, I'd like to hear you opinions on how this should be done.
Previous discussions regarding our release process indicate that voting
on a releas
On 9/16/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'd like to prepare the release of commons-logging 1.1.1. The release
> will be done entirely with Maven 2. Since this is fairly new for
> Commons, I'd like to hear you opinions on how this should be done.
>
I don't think using m
On 9/16/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to prepare the release of commons-logging 1.1.1. The release
> > will be done entirely with Maven 2. Since this is fairly new for
> > Commons, I'd like to hear you opinions on how this should be done.
commons-fileupload and commons
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 9/16/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all
I'd like to prepare the release of commons-logging 1.1.1. The release
will be done entirely with Maven 2. Since this is fairly new for
Commons, I'd like to hear you opinions on how this should be done.
I don'