On 20 May 2016 at 18:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:22 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 20 May 2016 at 18:09, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > I've seen some projects that run checkstyle early in the build and causes
>> > the build to fail if there are violations.
>> >
>> > That seems like
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:22 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 20 May 2016 at 18:09, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I've seen some projects that run checkstyle early in the build and causes
> > the build to fail if there are violations.
> >
> > That seems like a nice way to avoid piling up violations over time, an
On 20 May 2016 at 18:09, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I've seen some projects that run checkstyle early in the build and causes
> the build to fail if there are violations.
>
> That seems like a nice way to avoid piling up violations over time, and
> then spending time fixing them which is boring.
>
> I
I've seen some projects that run checkstyle early in the build and causes
the build to fail if there are violations.
That seems like a nice way to avoid piling up violations over time, and
then spending time fixing them which is boring.
I think we should do that.
Thoughts?
Gary
On Fri, May 20,
