; to get this set up properly with m2. Do any of our Maven mavens have the
> cycles for this?
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> --- On Sun, 3/1/09, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> From: Henri Yandell
>> Subject: Re: gauging sandbox interest - openmodels
>> To: "Commons
the cycles
for this?
Thanks,
Matt
--- On Sun, 3/1/09, Henri Yandell wrote:
> From: Henri Yandell
> Subject: Re: gauging sandbox interest - openmodels
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Sunday, March 1, 2009, 1:20 PM
> No reason not to give it a try and if
>
Hen,
--- On Sun, 3/1/09, Henri Yandell wrote:
> From: Henri Yandell
> Subject: Re: gauging sandbox interest - openmodels
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Sunday, March 1, 2009, 1:20 PM
> No reason not to give it a try and if
> it's too large it can m
Mark: see comments inline.
--- On Sun, 3/1/09, Mark Fortner wrote:
> From: Mark Fortner
> Subject: Re: gauging sandbox interest - openmodels
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Sunday, March 1, 2009, 1:23 PM
> Hi Matt,
> I like the idea; however, it might
Hi Matt,
I like the idea; however, it might make more sense to simply have domain
objects (and in the case of dbutils perhaps a small derby database) in each
project as necessary. This can be used to both improve the unit tests and
provide working examples of the code.
Mark
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at
No reason not to give it a try and if it's too large it can move out of Commons.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-449 might be of interest to it.
Hen
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> For awhile I've had an itch that it would be nice to have a project whose
> purp
For awhile I've had an itch that it would be nice to have a project whose
purpose is to provide small, realistic domain models for consumption primarily
by tests of library-type code (if the domain models are actually
usable/extensible for real work, so much the better). It seems to me that
p
