Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton wrote: OK good. I also added the bare bones of a site for JNet and have added it in to the list of sandbox components - should be there after the next sync: http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/index.html Again, thanks Niall! I'll continue with jnet in two weeks when I'm back fr

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton schrieb: >> >> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Niall Pemberton wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton schrieb: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I just copied the in

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! >>> Thanks everyone, >>> >>> I just c

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reinhard Pötz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I just copied the initial code to the sandbox. great. Carsten, Steven refactored the code so that internals of "parent-aware URLStreamHandlers" are hidden in an inner class an

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Reinhard Pötz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I just copied the initial code to the sandbox. great. Carsten, Steven refactored the code so that internals of "parent-aware URLStreamHandlers" are hidden in an inner class and it explicitly uses a

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I just copied the initial code to the sandbox. Mind if I fix a few things in the maven build? We have some properities tha

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Torsten Curdt wrote: >> >> Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! >> > Thanks everyone, > > I just copied the initial code to the sandbox. Mind if I fix a few things in the maven build? We have some properities that need to be s

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Torsten Curdt wrote: Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! Thanks everyone, I just copied the initial code to the sandbox. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional co

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-07 Thread Torsten Curdt
Thanks, Rahul! Karma granted! cheers -- Torsten On May 8, 2008, at 02:55, Rahul Akolkar wrote: Changing subject for better visibility. Sandbox karma requested by { cziegeler , reinhard }. -Rahul On 4/29/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/29/08, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROT

Sandbox karma request (was Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET)

2008-05-07 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Changing subject for better visibility. Sandbox karma requested by { cziegeler , reinhard }. -Rahul On 4/29/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/29/08, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > > > > > > > That'd be great. If you guys want to go

Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET

2008-04-29 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 4/29/08, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > > > > That'd be great. If you guys want to go ahead, someone will grant > > sandbox karma (if you need it). > > > > Once you get started, please add a proposal to the new component's > > trunk for archival (see examp

Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET

2008-04-29 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Rahul Akolkar wrote: It would be good to describe the scope for these additions / improvements (especially given that the library is currently small). See some recent proposals [1],[2],[3] for new sandbox components in this regard. Ah, ok - the lib has to be tested on several platforms; but I g

Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET

2008-04-29 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Rahul Akolkar wrote: That'd be great. If you guys want to go ahead, someone will grant sandbox karma (if you need it). Once you get started, please add a proposal to the new component's trunk for archival (see examples in my prior response in this thread). Yes, please give me karma as well.

Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET

2008-04-29 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 4/29/08, Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > > Inclusion into Commons Proper is a slightly different beast. You would > > need sufficient community interest (atleast as much as is needed for a > > graduation vote to pass). Before that happens, there can be no > >

Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET

2008-04-29 Thread Reinhard Pötz
Rahul Akolkar wrote: Inclusion into Commons Proper is a slightly different beast. You would need sufficient community interest (atleast as much as is needed for a graduation vote to pass). Before that happens, there can be no releases (none at all out of sandbox). Since Cocoon is already using

Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET

2008-04-28 Thread Torsten Curdt
But yes starting in "sandbox" is the usual path. I'd also think ...just get it into the sandbox. cheers -- Torsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET

2008-04-28 Thread simon
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 13:38 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On 4/28/08, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > we developed a nice little library over at the Excalibur project called > > jnet > > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/excalibur/trunk/components/sourceresolve/jnet/) >

Re: Possible contribution to commons: JNET

2008-04-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 4/28/08, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > we developed a nice little library over at the Excalibur project called > jnet > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/excalibur/trunk/components/sourceresolve/jnet/) > > It is a common purpose lib that allows you to dynamically registe