in commons, somewhere in the incubator, or labs?
> >>>
> >>> But regarding commons, before the component/jira/mailing list are
> created,
> >>> I think it would have to go either via sandbox or incubator first?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> P
would make it easier for others to evaluate the idea?
>>> Cheers
>>> Bruno
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Claude Warren
>>> To: Commons Developers List
>>> Sent
e somewhere like GitHub to show more or less the
>> concept would make it easier for others to evaluate the idea?
>> Cheers
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____
>> From: Claude Warren
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Sent: Tuesday
it easier for others to evaluate the idea?
> Cheers
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Claude Warren
> To: Commons Developers List
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 February 2018 11:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Discussion: New commons module/project
>
>
>
> The goal i
ssion: New commons module/project
The goal is arrive at a common understanding of the specific algorithm and
potentially one or more code examples for implementation which may be
pseudo code.
I think all this requires is:
1. jira (or similar) to track the discussions and mark them when
The goal is arrive at a common understanding of the specific algorithm and
potentially one or more code examples for implementation which may be
pseudo code.
I think all this requires is:
1. jira (or similar) to track the discussions and mark them when they
are closed
2. A mechanism to
Hello,
I am not sure how this might turn out, is it only discussion or do you also
want to develop a specification language/toolset? In either case it does not
sound like the typical commons sub-project. What infrastructure would you
require?
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
_
