Re: [commons-functor] branch master updated (1e3145b -> 9b217ed)

2020-11-24 Thread Gary Gregory
If a component has not been released yet, then, yes, it makes sense to not track these changes. Thank you for clarifying. Gary On Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 14:55 Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: > I left a comment when merging in Git (thought it would appear in here, > but it didn't, sorry). [functor] has

Re: [commons-functor] branch master updated (1e3145b -> 9b217ed)

2020-11-24 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
I left a comment when merging in Git (thought it would appear in here, but it didn't, sorry). [functor] has not been released yet. So I thought it wouldn't be necessary to have an entry in changes.xml as we are not updating from version X to Y. On Tuesday, 24 November 2020, 1:53:36 pm UTC,

Re: Commons functor

2013-10-23 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Hi Mats! >Hi, are there any plans for releasing this project? Yes, I'm already using [functor] in some experiments with fuzzy logic and Jenkins plug-ins, and having fun with JDK 8 lambdas. We still have two open issues before a release though. >The "Function" I need is a "PredicatedProcedure"

[functor] additions/improvements WAS Re: Commons Functor changes

2010-12-08 Thread Matt Benson
On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Haswell, Joe wrote: > Coming from a Haskell background, I really miss non-strict semantics in Java, > and it seems that functor's support for them is fairly limited (I do note > that it exists). It'd be fairly easy to implement them either over existing > functor i