On 22/06/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 22/06/2009, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > the intention is to CLEARLY use a invalid URI/URL to cause some
> > exceptions during regression tests - during the last RC we had issues
> > with OpenDNS and using ".invalid" was the agreed workarou
On 22/06/2009, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> the intention is to CLEARLY use a invalid URI/URL to cause some
> exceptions during regression tests - during the last RC we had issues
> with OpenDNS and using ".invalid" was the agreed workaround (which did
> not work either)
The use of
Hi Mark,
the intention is to CLEARLY use a invalid URI/URL to cause some
exceptions during regression tests - during the last RC we had issues
with OpenDNS and using ".invalid" was the agreed workaround (which did
not work either)
See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606
=== QUOTE from RFC2006 ===
