> -Original Message-
> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
> Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 23:34
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [vfs] JDK 1.5
>
>
> On Nov 8, 2009, at 10:24 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
> > Guys,
>
On Nov 8, 2009, at 10:24 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Guys,
looking at Ralph's comment in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-254
I am questionning myself, if there's any reason why vfs 2.0 should
still
have JDK 1.4 as requirement and not JDK 1.5. VFS 2.0 will be a major
release and JDK 1
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
> Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 22:24
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: [vfs] JDK 1.5
>
> Guys,
>
> looking at Ralph's comment in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-254
> I am questio
Hi!
> looking at Ralph's comment in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-254
> I am questionning myself, if there's any reason why vfs 2.0 should
> still
> have JDK 1.4 as requirement and not JDK 1.5.
If it is just me, I'd be happy to drop 1.4 dependency - Past votes were
declined. Prob
