> On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> +1 for an early release without the name parser. We can implement the
> algorithms from the book in 1.1.
Sounds good I’ll start heading that direction.
-Rob
>
> Benedikt
>
> Gary Gregory schrieb am Di. 29. Nov. 2016 um 00:34:
>
>>
+1 for an early release without the name parser. We can implement the
algorithms from the book in 1.1.
Benedikt
Gary Gregory schrieb am Di. 29. Nov. 2016 um 00:34:
> +1 to removing the human name code for 1.0. Put it in a branch IMO.
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Bruno P. Kinosh
+1 to removing the human name code for 1.0. Put it in a branch IMO.
Gary
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita <
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> First of all, kudos for the great work moving things from [lang] into
> [text].
>
> I got a copy of the Lothaire
If it were just me, I would:
- Port all relevant (with appropriate agreements from the community) code
from [lang] to [text].
- Release [text] 1.0
- Deprecate code in [lang]
- Release [lang] 3.6.
- Continue [text] on to 1.1 with NEW functionality.
IOW, I do not see the point of delaying [text] 1.
Hi Rob,
First of all, kudos for the great work moving things from [lang] into [text].
I got a copy of the Lothaire book last weekend, but haven't had a chance to
read it yet.
There was also some discussion around the name-parser, and since we couldn't
reach a consensus,
I think we could either
