On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:19 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 31/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Jukka Zitting
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Rahul Akolkar
>> wrote:
>> >> * Perhaps folks are indeed better off just looking at existing
On 31/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Rahul Akolkar
> wrote:
> >> * Perhaps folks are indeed better off just looking at existing
> >> components, rather than some templates (we actua
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Rahul Akolkar
> wrote:
>> * Perhaps folks are indeed better off just looking at existing
>> components, rather than some templates (we actually have fairly simple
>> components in the build and rel
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> * Perhaps folks are indeed better off just looking at existing
> components, rather than some templates (we actually have fairly simple
> components in the build and release sense, and having the current m2
> support in parent etc. mak
Rahul Akolkar wrote at Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2009 23:41:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Jukka Zitting
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm about to set up a sandbox are for some further work on the Commons
>>> XML (originally SAX) idea
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm about to set up a sandbox are for some further work on the Commons
>> XML (originally SAX) idea that we discussed a few weeks ago. When
>> looking for a good starti
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm about to set up a sandbox are for some further work on the Commons
> XML (originally SAX) idea that we discussed a few weeks ago. When
> looking for a good starting point I found the templates [1] and [2],
> but both seem a bit ou