Re: [rng] Tests in -sampling

2018-07-26 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Jul 25, 2018, at 9:48 PM, Gilles wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 21:08:57 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> On Jul 24, 2018, at 9:13 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Jul 24, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Gilles wrote: Hi Rob. On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 18:33:40 -0400, Rob T

Re: [rng] Tests in -sampling

2018-07-25 Thread Gilles
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 21:08:57 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Jul 24, 2018, at 9:13 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Jul 24, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Gilles wrote: Hi Rob. On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 18:33:40 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: I know that the tests will be necessarily non-deterministic, but we can at

Re: [rng] Tests in -sampling

2018-07-25 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 9:13 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > >> On Jul 24, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Gilles wrote: >> >> Hi Rob. >> >> On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 18:33:40 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> I know that the tests will be necessarily non-deterministic, but we >>> can at least get closer to having

Re: [rng] Tests in -sampling

2018-07-24 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Gilles wrote: > > Hi Rob. > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 18:33:40 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> I know that the tests will be necessarily non-deterministic, but we >> can at least get closer to having determinism by running the same test >> 1000 times and expecting som

Re: [rng] Tests in -sampling

2018-07-24 Thread Gilles
Hi Rob. On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 18:33:40 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: I know that the tests will be necessarily non-deterministic, but we can at least get closer to having determinism by running the same test 1000 times and expecting some reasonable number of passes right? Could we use the underlyi