Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 16:47, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> On 19/07/2019 15:09, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 15:31, Alex Herbert a
> > écrit :
> >> On 19/07/2019 14:15, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >>> Hello.
> >>>
> >>> Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 14:27, Alex Herbert a
On 19/07/2019 15:09, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hi.
Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 15:31, Alex Herbert a écrit :
On 19/07/2019 14:15, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 14:27, Alex Herbert a écrit :
One principle reason for SharedStateDiscreteSampler
and SharedStateContinuousSample
Hi.
Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 15:31, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> On 19/07/2019 14:15, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 14:27, Alex Herbert a
> > écrit :
> >> One principle reason for SharedStateDiscreteSampler
> >> and SharedStateContinuousSampler is to simplify th
On 19/07/2019 14:15, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 14:27, Alex Herbert a écrit :
One principle reason for SharedStateDiscreteSampler
and SharedStateContinuousSampler is to simplify the current design approach
for samplers that use internal delegates to provide optimised
Hello.
Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 14:27, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> One principle reason for SharedStateDiscreteSampler
> and SharedStateContinuousSampler is to simplify the current design approach
> for samplers that use internal delegates to provide optimised algorithms.
> However this creates an
One principle reason for SharedStateDiscreteSampler
and SharedStateContinuousSampler is to simplify the current design approach
for samplers that use internal delegates to provide optimised algorithms.
However this creates an inefficient outer class that is just wrapping the
implementation.
The id