On 7/13/15 1:19 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/13/15 12:55 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 7/13/15 12:16 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/13/15 12:55 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/13/15 12:16 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Gilles
>>> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/12/15 9:45 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
>>
On 7/13/15 12:55 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/13/15 12:16 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Gilles
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/12/15 9:45 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles
> wrote:
>>
On 7/13/15 12:16 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Gilles
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 7/12/15 9:45 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0200, Thomas N
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>> On 7/12/15 9:45 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles
>>> wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>
> On 07/12/
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/12/15 9:45 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles
wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/12/2015 04:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/
On 7/12/15 9:45 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 07/12/2015 04:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>
>> On 07/12/2015 04:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thom
On 7/12/15 10:38 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 07/12/2015 04:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The code imp
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/12/2015 04:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
The code implemen
On 07/12/2015 04:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of
On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
>>> monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
>>> Unfortunately, I th
On 7/11/15 3:38 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:12:29 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/11/15 3:06 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:08:16 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
monteCarloP in-lines efficient generati
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:12:29 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/11/15 3:06 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:08:16 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
Unfortunately, I t
On 7/11/15 3:06 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:08:16 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
>> monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
>> Unfortunately, I think the implementation is not quite random (see
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:08:16 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
Unfortunately, I think the implementation is not quite random (see
comments on the ticket). To verify it, we
How about a Randomize utility class?
Cheers,
- Ole
On 07/11/2015 02:40 PM, sebb wrote:
On 11 July 2015 at 20:29, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of ran
On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
>> monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
>> Unfortunately, I think the implementation is not quite random (see
>
On 11 July 2015 at 20:29, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
>> monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
>> Unfortunately, I think the implementation is not quite random
On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
> monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
> Unfortunately, I think the implementation is not quite random (see
> comments on the ticket). To verify it, we need
21 matches
Mail list logo