branches reintegrated, have a good work!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Claud.io,
>
>> which becomes something like:
>>
>> e
Hi Claud.io,
> which becomes something like:
>
> export( actual ).usingDotNotation().withName( "my graph" )
> .withVertexLabels( new VertexLabelMapper() )
> .withEdgeWeights( new EdgeWeightMapper() )
> .withEdgeLabels( new EdgeLa
Hi Simone,
While rearranging stuff to prepare the merge, I noticed that the
NamedExportSelector disappeared in favor of specifying the graph name
inside the usingXXXFormat() method.
I honestly think that in that way it lost part of the expressiveness -
even if it is less verbose.
I am in favor
While rearranging stuff to prepare the merge, I noticed that the
NamedExportSelector disappeared in favor of specifying the graph name
inside the usingXXXFormat() method.
I honestly think that in that way it lost part of the expressiveness -
even if it is less verbose.
I am in favor of having it
Yup I am aware that they are not completed, anyway I would like to
encourage their development on /trunk because:
* new algorithms can be implemented using new APIs (and I have an
idea about a new one)
* code is still in sandbox, no risk to break anything
So I'll merge last Thomas' commit in tr
Hi,
we could merge the branch and open some issues on Jira to track the
exporter problems, so people can contribute to fix them.
+1.
Note that the exporters are not complete yet, and there are still
interesting architectural decisions left unanswered.
Let's go for it!
Claudio
--
Claudio
Hi,
we could merge the branch and open some issues on Jira to track the
exporter problems, so people can contribute to fix them.
ciao
--
Marco Speranza
Google Code: http://code.google.com/u/marco.speranza79/
2012/3/23 Simone Tripodi :
> Hi all guys,
>
> in order to speedup things, I'd propos
