Yeah, that rings a bell.
Gary
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Isn't it the clirr plugin that's failing with bcel?
>
> On 2 June 2016 at 17:07, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> > Gary Gregory schrieb am Fr., 3. Juni 2016 um
> > 00:06 Uhr:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:15 PM
Isn't it the clirr plugin that's failing with bcel?
On 2 June 2016 at 17:07, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Gary Gregory schrieb am Fr., 3. Juni 2016 um
> 00:06 Uhr:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Jörg Schaible
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Gary Gregory wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:34
Gary Gregory schrieb am Fr., 3. Juni 2016 um
00:06 Uhr:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>
> > Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> dbrosIus schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um
> > >> 22:32 Uhr:
> > >>
> > >
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> > wrote:
> >
> >> dbrosIus schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um
> >> 22:32 Uhr:
> >>
> >> > It is still not functionally compatible. People parsing UNKNOWN
> >> > annot
Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
>> dbrosIus schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um
>> 22:32 Uhr:
>>
>> > It is still not functionally compatible. People parsing UNKNOWN
>> > annotations looking for generics (as was the right way before) will
>> > now
> > > ASAP.
> > >
> >
> > It's a Maven plugin that blows up IIRC.
> >
>
> Okay, if some one goes ahead and fixes the two interface problems, I can
> RM.
>
@Benedikt: Thank you for volunteering to RM!
@Sebb: Are you available for this task?
Gary
>
>
> as
> > a 5.x BC release needed ASAP that the Maven plugin(s) can pick up, also
> > ASAP.
> >
>
> It's a Maven plugin that blows up IIRC.
>
Okay, if some one goes ahead and fixes the two interface problems, I can RM.
Benedikt
>
> Gary
>
>
>
gt;
>
>>
>> >
>> > ---- Original message
>> > From: Benedikt Ritter
>> > Date: 06/02/2016 4:22 PM (GMT-05:00)
>> > To: Commons Developers List
>> > Subject: Re: [bcel] Deprecated InstructionConstants
>> >
>&g
his as
a 5.x BC release needed ASAP that the Maven plugin(s) can pick up, also
ASAP.
Gary
>
> >
> > Original message
> > From: Benedikt Ritter
> > Date: 06/02/2016 4:22 PM (GMT-05:00)
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [bce
#x27;t understood the situation correctly. If
our plan is to make a release that covers Java 8, we should go all the way.
>
> Original message
> From: Benedikt Ritter
> Date: 06/02/2016 4:22 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [bc
: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [bcel] Deprecated InstructionConstants
Okay, so were are we now?
- people are waiting for a new release
- package coords have changed - BC is broken
- sebb has put effort into making all changes compatible
- two interface changes remain
Is that correct? Then
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Okay, so were are we now?
>
> - people are waiting for a new release
> - package coords have changed - BC is broken
> - sebb has put effort into making all changes compatible
> - two interface changes remain
>
> Is that correct? Then let's
Okay, so were are we now?
- people are waiting for a new release
- package coords have changed - BC is broken
- sebb has put effort into making all changes compatible
- two interface changes remain
Is that correct? Then let's just get over with this two interfaces mach
make the API redesign after
On 2 June 2016 at 12:35, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sebb wrote:
>
>> Hang on please.
>>
>> There were plans to produce a new incompatible release with new Maven
>> coords and new package names.
>> However as I recall there was some pushback from users who wished to
>> have a drop-in release.
>
Hi,
sebb wrote:
> Hang on please.
>
> There were plans to produce a new incompatible release with new Maven
> coords and new package names.
> However as I recall there was some pushback from users who wished to
> have a drop-in release.
> That is not possible unless the release is binary compati
se a new
>> version with different package and Maven coordinates.
>> However this means downstream users have to update and recompile their
>> source.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2 June 2016 at 10:41, dbrosIus wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the problem with Co
From: sebb
Date: 06/02/2016 5:15 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [bcel] Deprecated InstructionConstants
On 2 June 2016 at 07:56, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Gary Gregory schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um
08:00 Uhr:
So trunk packages would be renamed _back_ from bcel6 to th
---
> From: sebb
> Date: 06/02/2016 5:15 AM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [bcel] Deprecated InstructionConstants
>
> On 2 June 2016 at 07:56, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> Gary Gregory schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um
>> 08:00 Uhr:
>
This is the problem with Commons.
Original message
From: sebb
Date: 06/02/2016 5:15 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [bcel] Deprecated InstructionConstants
On 2 June 2016 at 07:56, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Gary Gregory schrieb am Do., 2. J
On 2 June 2016 at 07:56, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Gary Gregory schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um
> 08:00 Uhr:
>
>> So trunk packages would be renamed _back_ from bcel6 to the 5.2 packages?
>>
>
> That's what I understood from sebb's last message.
Yes, that would need to happen to support BC.
>
>>
Gary Gregory schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um
08:00 Uhr:
> So trunk packages would be renamed _back_ from bcel6 to the 5.2 packages?
>
That's what I understood from sebb's last message.
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > Hang on please.
> >
> > There were plans to p
So trunk packages would be renamed _back_ from bcel6 to the 5.2 packages?
Gary
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, sebb wrote:
> Hang on please.
>
> There were plans to produce a new incompatible release with new Maven
> coords and new package names.
> However as I recall there was some pushback fr
I would go with the first option.
sebb schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um 00:43:
> Hang on please.
>
> There were plans to produce a new incompatible release with new Maven
> coords and new package names.
> However as I recall there was some pushback from users who wished to
> have a drop-in releas
Hang on please.
There were plans to produce a new incompatible release with new Maven
coords and new package names.
However as I recall there was some pushback from users who wished to
have a drop-in release.
That is not possible unless the release is binary compatible.
So I spent quite a bit of
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm)
wrote:
> > The interface org.apache.commons.bcel6.generic.InstructionConstants is
> > deprecated in favor of a class. It seems OK to delete it since bcel6 is
> > a major new release.
> >
> > Check?
>
> Had a look at the source and history:
>
> S
25 matches
Mail list logo
