Re: [RNG] Evaluating work required for a multi-module project

2016-10-21 Thread Artem Barger
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Please read the documentation on the maven site plugin - > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin/ > examples/multimodule.html plugins/maven-site-plugin/examples/multimodule.html>. “mvn site” builds > t

Re: [RNG] Evaluating work required for a multi-module project

2016-10-21 Thread Artem Barger
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Gilles wrote: > As I feared: > $ mvn clean site > does not produce everything... > > ​I think that in case of multi model project simple "mvn site" won't be enough, ​not sure but I think that "mvn site:deploy" should do the work in that case. > Is there an alt

Re: [RNG] Evaluating work required for a multi-module project

2016-10-21 Thread Ralph Goers
Please read the documentation on the maven site plugin - https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin/examples/multimodule.html . “mvn site” builds the sites for all the individual modules but it does not put th

Re: [RNG] Evaluating work required for a multi-module project

2016-10-21 Thread Gilles
Hello. On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 02:31:33 +0300, Artem Barger wrote: ​Hi Gilles,​ On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Gilles wrote: Hi Artem. Would you be willing to create a branch containing actual files? If so, since the break-down into modules I'm thinking of is not the one you've taken below

Re: [RNG] Evaluating work required for a multi-module project (Was: [ALL] Component with multiple modules?)

2016-10-20 Thread Artem Barger
​Hi Gilles,​ On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hi Artem. > > Would you be willing to create a branch containing actual > files? > > If so, since the break-down into modules I'm thinking of is > not the one you've taken below,[1] I suggest that you create > an "all-example" module,

Re: [RNG] Evaluating work required for a multi-module project (Was: [ALL] Component with multiple modules?)

2016-10-20 Thread Artem Barger
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hi Artem. > > Would you be willing to create a branch containing actual > files? > ​Yes, will do it today.​ > > If so, since the break-down into modules I'm thinking of is > not the one you've taken below,[1] I suggest that you create > an "all-