Re: [Configuration] Building

2009-04-01 Thread Oliver Heger
sebb wrote: > On 01/04/2009, James Carman wrote: > >>On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Ralph Goers >> wrote: >> > I've been reviewing the site documentation and wanted to update the >> > documentation to talk about running the Webdav test. But the building page >> > says that Maven 1.x is the pr

Re: [Configuration] Building

2009-04-01 Thread sebb
On 01/04/2009, James Carman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > > I've been reviewing the site documentation and wanted to update the > > documentation to talk about running the Webdav test. But the building page > > says that Maven 1.x is the preferred build too

Re: [Configuration] Building

2009-04-01 Thread James Ring
Hey, On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:00 AM, sebb wrote: >> wrote: >> > >> > Do we really need to support Ant, Maven 1.x and Maven 2? > > If the project supports Java 1.3, then IMO it should have a way of > building and testing on Java 1.3, in which case it needs something > else other than Maven 2

Re: [Configuration] Building

2009-03-31 Thread James Carman
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I've been reviewing the site documentation and wanted to update the > documentation to talk about running the Webdav test. But the building page > says that Maven 1.x is the preferred build tool and that ant can also be > used. Yet I've done a