Hi Jörg...
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:joerg.schai...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 01:17
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote at
:flame...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 21:34
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]
>
> Would love to see this.
>
> I'll go and put the historic Lang ones together if you let me know how
> you'd like it to
Hi Gary,
Gary Gregory wrote at Monday, 5. April 2010 18:16:
> Seeing the discussion about [daemon] and not releasing made me think of
> another use for a test jar file.
>
> What I would like to know when evaluating an RC for releasing a
> maintenance of a commons component (from x.y.n to x.y.n+1
Would love to see this.
I'll go and put the historic Lang ones together if you let me know how
you'd like it to look.
Hen
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Seeing the discussion about [daemon] and not releasing made me think of
> another use for a test jar file.
>
> What I
On 05/04/2010, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:17
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]
> >
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:17
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]
>
> On 05/04/2010, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I do not think Clirr is e
lures
are OK and which are not. This is not to say that the tests should not
be run, just that they may involve a lot of manual checking.
> Gary
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabr...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 05, 20
ailto:gudnabr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 10:00
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]
>
> Is it not sufficient to simply run clirr reports before a release?
>
> -Matt
>
> On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:16 AM, G
Is it not sufficient to simply run clirr reports before a release?
-Matt
On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Seeing the discussion about [daemon] and not releasing made me
think of another use for a test jar file.
What I would like to know when evaluating an RC for releasing a
Seeing the discussion about [daemon] and not releasing made me think of another
use for a test jar file.
What I would like to know when evaluating an RC for releasing a maintenance of
a commons component (from x.y.n to x.y.n+1) is that there is 100% binary
compatibility.
As part of the build I
10 matches
Mail list logo
