On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
> hopefully facilitate wider
Hi Niall,
Niall Pemberton wrote on Friday, August 03, 2007 3:52 AM:
[snip]
>>> Since the test implies some nasty error condition (I did not have a
>>> look at the code yet), it might simply reveal some error of the JDK
>>> (especially since IBM JDK 1.4.2 works) ...
>>
>> BeanUtils has "per Clas
On 8/3/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/2/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Niall,
> >
> > I downloaded the source tar ball and build it from scratch with M2 on Linux
> > using my compiler zoo.
> >
> > One note in advance: There's a lot of logging at the conso
On 8/2/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Niall,
>
> I downloaded the source tar ball and build it from scratch with M2 on Linux
> using my compiler zoo.
>
> One note in advance: There's a lot of logging at the console along with
> quite some printed stack traces. However, for most o
Hi Niall,
I downloaded the source tar ball and build it from scratch with M2 on Linux
using my compiler zoo.
One note in advance: There's a lot of logging at the console along with
quite some printed stack traces. However, for most of my JDK's (Blackdown
1.4.2.03, IDM JDK 1.4.2.9, JRockit 1.4.2.1
All looks good. +1
Oliver
Niall Pemberton wrote:
Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
hopefully facilitate wider testing fo
+1 from me btw
Niall
On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
> hope
On 8/1/07, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm +1.
>
> WRT the RAT report, is there a reason we don't include the ASL header?
Its not part of the distro - I just ran it from the command line for
anyone reviewing the RC (same with clirr report).
Niall
> On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAI
On 8/1/07, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1.
>
> Lets get a release out and have a plan for the next release too.
Sounds good, do you have any suggestions? IMO it was important that
this release was compatibile for all the bugs fixed. A BeanUtils 2.0
with deprecations and copied Collec
I'm +1.
WRT the RAT report, is there a reason we don't include the ASL header?
On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> Since BeanUtils
+1.
Lets get a release out and have a plan for the next release too.
On 8/2/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All the usual tests pass (sigs, keys, maven/mvn/ant builds from src
> > zip, archive equiv). The Ant build does sa
On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All the usual tests pass (sigs, keys, maven/mvn/ant builds from src
> > zip, archive equiv). The Ant build does say the following again and
> > again:
> >
> > [copy] Warning: org/apa
On 8/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All the usual tests pass (sigs, keys, maven/mvn/ant builds from src
> zip, archive equiv). The Ant build does say the following again and
> again:
>
> [copy] Warning: org/apache/commons/beanutils/expression modified
> in the future.
>
> No
All the usual tests pass (sigs, keys, maven/mvn/ant builds from src
zip, archive equiv). The Ant build does say the following again and
again:
[copy] Warning: org/apache/commons/beanutils/expression modified
in the future.
No biggy if no one else can reproduce that.
Only query would be whet
14 matches
Mail list logo
