n
>> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 8:23 PM
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [VFS] Minimum Java version
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:58 PM, wrote:
>> > In favour of 1.5 as minimum.
>> > Older JDKs are EOL - and java5 came w
> -Original Message-
> From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com]
> On Behalf Of James Carman
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 8:23 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VFS] Minimum Java version
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:58 PM, wrote:
> In favour of 1.5 as minimum.
> Older JDKs are EOL - and java5 came with a lot of enhancements.
>
JDK5 is very close to EOSL!
http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index_jdk5.jsp
-
To un
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has not been
released and the developers are considering making the minimum version JDK 5.
We are interested in getting feedback from the community however before this
change is made. So pl
Hi Ralph,
+1 on Java 5.
Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 19. August 2009 16:34:
> The packages haven't been changed so far. But this would definitely
> have to be considered whether we would want to take on the package
> renaming right now.
>
> The minimum JDK for 1.0 was 1.3, although it isn't c
Hi!
+1 on Java 5.
> Are they going to change the package name?
Let's discuss this once we cross this bridge.
Ciao,
Mario
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@co
+1 for Java 5.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 7:18 AM
> To: Commons Developers List; Commons Users List
> Subject: [VFS] Minimum Java version
>
> Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4.
On Aug 19, 2009, at 7:18 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has
not been released and the developers are considering making the
minimum version JDK 5. We are interested in getting feedback from
the community however before this change is
The packages haven't been changed so far. But this would definitely
have to be considered whether we would want to take on the package
renaming right now.
The minimum JDK for 1.0 was 1.3, although it isn't clear that that was
correct. The minimum JDK for 2.0 has already been changed to 1.4
Are they going to change the package name?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has not been
> released and the developers are considering making the minimum version JDK
> 5. We are interested in getting feedback fro
10 matches
Mail list logo
