On 8/25/13 11:15 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I think that it will be somewhat slower, but next to imperceptibly so.
>
> It will not be any more accurate.
>
> It should be noted, however, that this code will fail for input longer than
> 2^16 because of integer overflow.
Good point. We should either c
I think that it will be somewhat slower, but next to imperceptibly so.
It will not be any more accurate.
It should be noted, however, that this code will fail for input longer than
2^16 because of integer overflow.
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Dave Brosius wrote:
> I would think that in
I would think that in
public double mannWhitneyU(final double[] x, final double[] y)
final double U1 = sumRankX - (x.length * (x.length + 1)) / 2;
should be
final double U1 = sumRankX - (x.length * (x.length + 1)) / 2*.0*;
right?
