Of course we do. It seems the landing page / detailed example is still not
steering users towards the Javadoc which anyhow is not the best media to
explain 'how to' (imho).
Transforming/extracting 'how to's from the unit tests could be the cheapest way
to improve on this area. (As in: how do I i
PM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exposing my own/wrapper functions using JEXL
This message originated Externally. Use proper judgement and caution with
attachments, links, or responses.
Hi;
JEXL 3.3. has increased default security by restricting permissions to a very
narrow set of al
Do we need better documentation on the site?
Gary
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023, 5:45 AM Henri Biestro wrote:
> Hi;
> JEXL 3.3. has increased default security by restricting permissions to a
> very narrow set of allowed classes. In your case, you need to allow JEXL to
> introspect your package by configu
Hi;
JEXL 3.3. has increased default security by restricting permissions to a very
narrow set of allowed classes. In your case, you need to allow JEXL to
introspect your package by configuring your permissions. Have a look at
JexlPermissions javadoc for more explanations.
On JEXL 3.3, with Java 1
Hi,
I was trying to expose my own functions using JEXL library. I am trying the
below example.
public static class MyMath {
public double cos(final double x) {
return Math.cos(x);
}
}
public static void testCustomFunction2() {
try {
