Re: [vfs] VFS.getManager and FileCache

2009-08-13 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Mario, coming back to this now again ... ;-) Mario Ivankovits wrote at Donnerstag, 6. August 2009 17:36: > Hi! > > Using weak ref as default seems not too bad. However, since the file > objects have just their parent cached it might lead to much more file > system access then now as a parent

Re: [vfs] VFS.getManager and FileCache

2009-08-06 Thread Mario Ivankovits
2009 11:07 An: dev@commons.apache.org Betreff: [vfs] VFS.getManager and FileCache Hi gang, the docs of VFS praise VFS.getManager() as simplest possibility to work with VFS. However, this setup uses a SortRefFileCache as default implementation. This caused our server app to fail, since it means

[vfs] VFS.getManager and FileCache

2009-08-06 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi gang, the docs of VFS praise VFS.getManager() as simplest possibility to work with VFS. However, this setup uses a SortRefFileCache as default implementation. This caused our server app to fail, since it means that FileObject instances are only garbage collected if the Java process runs out of