ving the human name parser elsewhere,
>>> reviewing the edit distances,
>>> and checking if there's anything else we could put into this initial
>>> release from [lang].
>>>
>>> Once it has been released, we will be able to add things from Lothaire
&
dd things from Lothaire
> > book,
> > more edit distances, maybe bring back the name parser, as well as any
> > enhancement
> > bug fixing.
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> > >
> > > From: Rob Tompkins
> > >To: Common
book,
> more edit distances, maybe bring back the name parser, as well as any
> enhancement
> bug fixing.
>
> Bruno
>
> >________
> > From: Rob Tompkins
> >To: Commons Developers List
> >Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:45 AM
> >Subject: [text] N
If it were just me, I would:
- Port all relevant (with appropriate agreements from the community) code
from [lang] to [text].
- Release [text] 1.0
- Deprecate code in [lang]
- Release [lang] 3.6.
- Continue [text] on to 1.1 with NEW functionality.
IOW, I do not see the point of delaying [text] 1.
maybe bring back the name parser, as well as any
enhancement
bug fixing.
Bruno
>
> From: Rob Tompkins
>To: Commons Developers List
>Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:45 AM
>Subject: [text] Next steps.
>
>
>Hello,
>
>I'm a
Hello,
I'm a tad curious what folks (along with Gary, Benedikt, and Bruno) think
the next steps are for text in the hopeful thought that we are eventually
heading towards a 1.0 release. Some thoughts that come to mind are:
(1) Go over lang with fine tooth comb and see what we think should move,
(
