Re: [text] Complete test coverage for RandomStringGenerator

2016-12-27 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Am 27.12.2016 um 11:51 schrieb Duncan Jones: On 27 Dec 2016, at 10:29, Gilles wrote: Hi. On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 09:54:29 + (UTC), djo...@apache.org wrote: A string of length zero hardly qualifies as random. Shouldn't "generate(0)" rather raise an exception? [I know that "nextInt(1)" is also

Re: [text] Complete test coverage for RandomStringGenerator

2016-12-27 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Dec 27, 2016, at 5:51 AM, Duncan Jones wrote: > > >> On 27 Dec 2016, at 10:29, Gilles wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >>> On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 09:54:29 + (UTC), djo...@apache.org wrote: >>> Repository: commons-text >>> Updated Branches: >>> refs/heads/master 1b3e44809 -> 0b1ca53b3 >>> >>> >>>

Re: [text] Complete test coverage for RandomStringGenerator

2016-12-27 Thread Duncan Jones
> On 27 Dec 2016, at 10:29, Gilles wrote: > > Hi. > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 09:54:29 + (UTC), djo...@apache.org wrote: >> Repository: commons-text >> Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/master 1b3e44809 -> 0b1ca53b3 >> >> >> Complete test coverage for RandomStringGenerator >> >> Project: http

Re: [text] Complete test coverage for RandomStringGenerator

2016-12-27 Thread Gilles
Hi. On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 09:54:29 + (UTC), djo...@apache.org wrote: Repository: commons-text Updated Branches: refs/heads/master 1b3e44809 -> 0b1ca53b3 Complete test coverage for RandomStringGenerator Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-text/repo Commit: http://git-w