Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-09-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/12/10 10:03 PM, Jacob Beard wrote: Hi, I'm continuing to make progress on the build system, and there's currently one issue upon which I could use some guidance. First, here's an update on the current status of the [scxml-js] build system. The build architecture is currently structured lik

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-09-12 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi, I'm continuing to make progress on the build system, and there's currently one issue upon which I could use some guidance. First, here's an update on the current status of the [scxml-js] build system. The build architecture is currently structured like this: http://stuff.echo-flow.com/build-

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-30 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Jacob Beard wrote: > On 10-08-29 07:51 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Phil Steitz >>  wrote: >>> Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Jacob Beard  wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a Maven question

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-29 Thread Jacob Beard
On 10-08-29 07:51 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: Hi, I have a Maven question which seems appropriate for this list. I'm having some trouble understan

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-29 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a Maven question which seems appropriate for this list. >>> >>> I'm having some trouble understanding how precisely Maven is used in the >>> r

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-29 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi, > > I've checked in. > > I'm in Paris now for the SVG Open conference, so I'm probably not going to > have time to work on this for the next week. Have fun at the paper presentation (and elsewhere too :-). > After that, I think I'll cha

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-29 Thread Phil Steitz
Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a Maven question which seems appropriate for this list. >> >> I'm having some trouble understanding how precisely Maven is used in the >> release process. I think CreatingReleases doesn't really describ

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-29 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi, I've checked in. I'm in Paris now for the SVG Open conference, so I'm probably not going to have time to work on this for the next week. After that, I think I'll change tactics, and start investigating how to do this the "Maven way", probably writing a set of custom plugins rather than de

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-28 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi Rahul, So far, I have not found any technical shortcomings that would seem to indicate that Maven2 with AntRun will not work. I feel the main challenge is the Maven community's reluctance to support such solutions, which makes it difficult for me to obtain answers to my questions. In any c

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-27 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi Rahul, > > There's another thread on the Maven list which could use your attention. See > subject "question on capabilities of AntRun plugin". > > Basically, it seems several people on the Maven list are of the opinion > that, in general, it

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-27 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi Rahul, There's another thread on the Maven list which could use your attention. See subject "question on capabilities of AntRun plugin". Basically, it seems several people on the Maven list are of the opinion that, in general, it's very bad to delegate to AntRun. One of the last comments

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-26 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi, > > I've brought up a question on the maven list which I was wondering if others > could weigh on. Basically, the question is what is the best way to deal with > JavaScript library dependencies for which no Maven repository exists. One > pe

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-26 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi, I've brought up a question on the maven list which I was wondering if others could weigh on. Basically, the question is what is the best way to deal with JavaScript library dependencies for which no Maven repository exists. One person has encouraged me to set up a Maven repository on my p

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-25 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:13 PM, sebb wrote: > On 25 August 2010 22:23, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Jacob Beard wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've completed initial integration of Maven with the Ant build script. >>> Maven's compile phase now builds the combined js file and

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-25 Thread sebb
On 25 August 2010 22:23, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Jacob Beard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've completed initial integration of Maven with the Ant build script. >> Maven's compile phase now builds the combined js file and the single class >> file. The package phase is then

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-25 Thread sebb
On 25 August 2010 06:41, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a Maven question which seems appropriate for this list. >> >> I'm having some trouble understanding how precisely Maven is used in the >> release process. I think CreatingRelea

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-25 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi, > > I've completed initial integration of Maven with the Ant build script. > Maven's compile phase now builds the combined js file and the single class > file. The package phase is then able to successfully create an executable > jar. > C

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-25 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi, I've completed initial integration of Maven with the Ant build script. Maven's compile phase now builds the combined js file and the single class file. The package phase is then able to successfully create an executable jar. My next question is, is it important to phase out getDeps.xml,

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi, > > I have a Maven question which seems appropriate for this list. > > I'm having some trouble understanding how precisely Maven is used in the > release process. I think CreatingReleases doesn't really describe it, except > in the bottom

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-24 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi, I have a Maven question which seems appropriate for this list. I'm having some trouble understanding how precisely Maven is used in the release process. I think CreatingReleases doesn't really describe it, except in the bottom section "Procedure for creating a release using M2 (outdated b

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi Rahul, > > I read through all of the materials you linked to. I have technical > questions about how to integrate maven with ant for the purposes of creating > releases, but I'll save those for the maven user's list. I do have a few > other

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-24 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi Rahul, I read through all of the materials you linked to. I have technical questions about how to integrate maven with ant for the purposes of creating releases, but I'll save those for the maven user's list. I do have a few other process-oriented questions. First, http://wiki.apache.org/

Re: [scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi, > > I've been working to overhaul the build system to phase out the custom > JavaScript build script in favor of Ant. I'm currently writing a blog post > about the full process leading up to this, but suffice it to say that I now > have an

[scxml-js] working toward a release

2010-08-23 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi, I've been working to overhaul the build system to phase out the custom JavaScript build script in favor of Ant. I'm currently writing a blog post about the full process leading up to this, but suffice it to say that I now have an Ant script working that has most of the functionality of th