Re: [proxy] Cutting a release...

2007-11-21 Thread janszm
Hi, Has a Proxy 1.0 release been cut yet? I couldnt find any details on the website or find anything in the download area. Cheers, Menno -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-proxy--Cutting-a-release...-tf4533693.html#a13875539 Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list

Re: [proxy] Cutting a release...

2007-10-15 Thread James Carman
Done. On 10/15/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Carman wrote: > > > All, > > > > It's been a while since Commons Proxy has had any attention, but I > > have received two emails in the past two days about it. So, I would > > like to cut a 1.0 release for it. I know I need to d

Re: [proxy] Cutting a release...

2007-10-15 Thread Jörg Schaible
James Carman wrote: > All, > > It's been a while since Commons Proxy has had any attention, but I > have received two emails in the past two days about it. So, I would > like to cut a 1.0 release for it. I know I need to do a little work, > since the site is a bit out-dated (the SVN links are i

Re: [proxy] Cutting a release...

2007-09-28 Thread James Carman
Ok, then I'll change mine to optional. Thanks for the clarification, Dennis. On 9/28/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Optional means that you can use the product without these dependencies > present. Take commons-logging as an example. It has optional > dependencies on log4j and t

Re: [proxy] Cutting a release...

2007-09-28 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Here's a page with more details: http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html Dennis Lundberg wrote: Optional means that you can use the product without these dependencies present. Take commons-logging as an example. It has optional dependencies on log4

Re: [proxy] Cutting a release...

2007-09-28 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Optional means that you can use the product without these dependencies present. Take commons-logging as an example. It has optional dependencies on log4j and the other logging implementations. In the real world though it will only use one of these. So they are optional. Provided means that tha

Re: [proxy] Cutting a release...

2007-09-28 Thread James Carman
The dependencies are truly optional. I marked them as provided so that they wouldn't get picked up transitively (as you stated) by client projects. If they want to use the pieces of commons-proxy that need those extra libs, then they can explicitly add them to their POM. So, does that mean I sho

Re: [proxy] Cutting a release...

2007-09-28 Thread Ben Speakmon
Using provided doesn't tell maven to ignore the dependency, it just means that it's expected that the user will install it into his local repository himself or that it will be on the same classloader as the application when it's running. maven will still complain if it can't find it. Optional depe

Re: [proxy] Cutting a release...

2007-09-28 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Carman wrote: > All, Hi James, > > It's been a while since Commons Proxy has had any attention, but I > have received two emails in the past two days about it. So, I would > like to cut a 1.0 release for it. A 1.0 would be excellent. I am also

Re: [proxy] Cutting a release...

2007-09-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > It's been a while since Commons Proxy has had any attention, but I > have received two emails in the past two days about it. So, I would > like to cut a 1.0 release for it. I know I need to do a little work, > since the site is a bit

[proxy] Cutting a release...

2007-09-28 Thread James Carman
All, It's been a while since Commons Proxy has had any attention, but I have received two emails in the past two days about it. So, I would like to cut a 1.0 release for it. I know I need to do a little work, since the site is a bit out-dated (the SVN links are incorrect) from the TLP move. Wer