Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 29/08/2010 00:25, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have started integrating the FastMath class from MATH-375. I have not
>>> committed anything for now as I am first fixing numerous checkstyle
>>> errors (more than 300) and wanted to have
Some of these tests might benefit from choosing values from a highly skewed
distribution. Gamma(0.01, 0.01), for instance will exercise small and large
values much better than an exponential distribution.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> We could start by a random set of v
Le 29/08/2010 00:25, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have started integrating the FastMath class from MATH-375. I have not
>> committed anything for now as I am first fixing numerous checkstyle
>> errors (more than 300) and wanted to have one clean commit to simplify
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:25:23 -0400, wrote:
> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have started integrating the FastMath class from MATH-375. I have not
> > committed anything for now as I am first fixing numerous checkstyle
> > errors (more than 300) and wanted to have one clean commit to
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have started integrating the FastMath class from MATH-375. I have not
> committed anything for now as I am first fixing numerous checkstyle
> errors (more than 300) and wanted to have one clean commit to simplify
> patching both trunk for 3.0 and branch 2.X.
>
Hi all,
I have started integrating the FastMath class from MATH-375. I have not
committed anything for now as I am first fixing numerous checkstyle
errors (more than 300) and wanted to have one clean commit to simplify
patching both trunk for 3.0 and branch 2.X.
One less obvious problem is unit t
