On 7/13/15 1:19 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/13/15 12:55 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 7/13/15 12:16 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/13/15 12:55 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/13/15 12:16 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Gilles
>>> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/12/15 9:45 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
>>
On 7/13/15 12:55 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/13/15 12:16 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Gilles
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/12/15 9:45 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles
> wrote:
>>
On 7/13/15 12:16 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Gilles
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 7/12/15 9:45 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0200, Thomas N
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>> On 7/12/15 9:45 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles
>>> wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>
> On 07/12/
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:30:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/12/15 9:45 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles
wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/12/2015 04:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/
On 7/12/15 9:45 PM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 07/12/2015 04:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>
>> On 07/12/2015 04:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thom
On 7/12/15 10:38 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 07/12/2015 04:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The code imp
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:45 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/12/2015 04:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
The code implemen
On 07/12/2015 04:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
On 7/12/15 2:50 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of
On 07/11/2015 09:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
>>> monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
>>> Unfortunately, I th
On 7/11/15 3:38 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:12:29 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/11/15 3:06 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:08:16 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
monteCarloP in-lines efficient generati
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:12:29 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/11/15 3:06 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:08:16 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
Unfortunately, I t
On 7/11/15 3:06 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:08:16 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
>> monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
>> Unfortunately, I think the implementation is not quite random (see
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:08:16 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
Unfortunately, I think the implementation is not quite random (see
comments on the ticket). To verify it, we
How about a Randomize utility class?
Cheers,
- Ole
On 07/11/2015 02:40 PM, sebb wrote:
On 11 July 2015 at 20:29, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of ran
On 7/11/15 12:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
>> monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
>> Unfortunately, I think the implementation is not quite random (see
>
On 11 July 2015 at 20:29, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
>> monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
>> Unfortunately, I think the implementation is not quite random
On 07/11/2015 09:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
> monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
> Unfortunately, I think the implementation is not quite random (see
> comments on the ticket). To verify it, we need
The code implemented in MATH-1242 to improve performance of KS
monteCarloP in-lines efficient generation of random boolean arrays.
Unfortunately, I think the implementation is not quite random (see
comments on the ticket). To verify it, we need to be able to test
the random boolean array generat
22 matches
Mail list logo