On Feb 16, 2008 9:43 AM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phil Steitz a écrit :
> > On 2/15/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The changes I commited 5 days ago for r620289 introduced lots of javadocs
> >> errors. They add a link to the addValue(double[]) method which i
Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 2/15/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The changes I commited 5 days ago for r620289 introduced lots of javadocs
errors. They add a link to the addValue(double[]) method which is defined in the
implementing class, not in the interface.
What would be the b
On 2/15/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The changes I commited 5 days ago for r620289 introduced lots of javadocs
> errors. They add a link to the addValue(double[]) method which is defined in
> the
> implementing class, not in the interface.
>
> What would be the best fix: chan
The changes I commited 5 days ago for r620289 introduced lots of javadocs
errors. They add a link to the addValue(double[]) method which is defined in the
implementing class, not in the interface.
What would be the best fix: change all the javadoc comments or push the method
up in the interface ?
