However, the infinite class would have allowed integration from [-Inf,
>> C!=0].
>> Can you manage that with Gauss Hermite?
>>
>
> I don't think so (non-authoritative answer).
> that the answer is 1).]
>
>
Just Posted MATH-1015 which describes how you'd do this with your
integration methods.
Cheer
You mean just move the Infinite.class to the test section?
Sure ... go ahead.
-Ajo
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 07:50:25 -0700, Ajo Fod wrote:
>
>> It would be nice to know whether the Gauss-Hermite implementation recently
>>
>> added proves useful fo
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 07:50:25 -0700, Ajo Fod wrote:
It would be nice to know whether the Gauss-Hermite implementation
recently
added proves useful for that purpose; and if so, whether it could be
added
as a non-trivial example in the user guide.
I'll check it out when I get back to it.
It would be nice to know whether the Gauss-Hermite implementation recently
> added proves useful for that purpose; and if so, whether it could be added
> as a non-trivial example in the user guide.
>
I'll check it out when I get back to it.
>
> How do you propose to do the test without a change
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:03:15 -0700, Ajo Fod wrote:
So, given this development, I'm not particularly motivated to
develop AQ
further.
So, all the fuss just to use a numerical method for computing a
value
known in advance?
The fuss was about the ability to compute the partition function
>
> So, given this development, I'm not particularly motivated to develop AQ
>> further.
>>
>
> So, all the fuss just to use a numerical method for computing a value
> known in advance?
The fuss was about the ability to compute the partition function for the
exponential family. It has closed for
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 17:41:16 -0700, Ajo Fod wrote:
Based on the tests you posted it seems like Gauss-Hermite fills the
capability CM was missing of doing one class of improper integrals.
However, the infinite class would have allowed integration from
[-Inf,
C!=0].
Can you manage that with Gaus
Based on the tests you posted it seems like Gauss-Hermite fills the
capability CM was missing of doing one class of improper integrals.
However, the infinite class would have allowed integration from [-Inf,
C!=0].
Can you manage that with Gauss Hermite?
So, given this development, I'm not particu
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 08:04:05 -0700, Ajo Fod wrote:
[...]
Here is some numerical analysis on the issue:
Laguerre is defined only in [0,+ve Inf]
Hermite is defined in [-Inf,+Inf]
I have two issues with the above:
1: Cant imagine how someone would use AQ. Which means as Gilles
noticed,
you can'
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 08:04:05 -0700, Ajo Fod wrote:
The patches for Math-994 have been reworked ... slightly better
design.
Sorry but I don't understand the purpose of adding a patch to
a closed issue...
Here is some numerical analysis on the issue:
Laguerre is defined only in [0,+ve Inf]
Her
The patches for Math-994 have been reworked ... slightly better design.
Here is some numerical analysis on the issue:
Laguerre is defined only in [0,+ve Inf]
Hermite is defined in [-Inf,+Inf]
I have two issues with the above:
1: Cant imagine how someone would use AQ. Which means as Gilles notice
On 6/28/13 7:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:43:22 -0700, Ajo Fod wrote:
>> As I read through the Wikipedia articles on Gauss-Hermite and
>> Laguerre, I
>> notice that they are talking about basis functions with
>> infinity/s in its
>> domain. How would this would solve the problem a
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:43:22 -0700, Ajo Fod wrote:
As I read through the Wikipedia articles on Gauss-Hermite and
Laguerre, I
notice that they are talking about basis functions with infinity/s in
its
domain. How would this would solve the problem addressed in the
MATH-994
which is to restrict
As I read through the Wikipedia articles on Gauss-Hermite and Laguerre, I
notice that they are talking about basis functions with infinity/s in its
domain. How would this would solve the problem addressed in the MATH-994
which is to restrict the bounds of the function being integrated so that
num
On 6/23/13 3:14 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 22:36:04 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 6/21/13 5:17 PM, Ajo Fod wrote:
>>> I've submitted a patch for the issue (see MATH-994). This will
>>> allow users
>>> to integrate functions with infinity as one of the bounds.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ajo
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 22:36:04 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/21/13 5:17 PM, Ajo Fod wrote:
I've submitted a patch for the issue (see MATH-994). This will allow
users
to integrate functions with infinity as one of the bounds.
Cheers,
Ajo Fod.
Thanks for bringing the discussion to the dev list,
On 6/21/13 5:17 PM, Ajo Fod wrote:
> I've submitted a patch for the issue (see MATH-994). This will allow users
> to integrate functions with infinity as one of the bounds.
>
> Cheers,
> Ajo Fod.
>
Thanks for bringing the discussion to the dev list, Ajo. As Gilles
said on the ticket, its a little
I've submitted a patch for the issue (see MATH-994). This will allow users
to integrate functions with infinity as one of the bounds.
Cheers,
Ajo Fod.
18 matches
Mail list logo
