Re: [math] Validation of special functions

2012-10-20 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/19/12 7:43 AM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > Hi Phil, > thanks for your answer. > > 2012/10/19 Phil Steitz : >> On 10/18/12 11:13 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I have recently started to update the users guide on special >>> functions, providing accuracy measurements of our implementa

Re: [math] Validation of special functions

2012-10-19 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 10/19/2012 04:16 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 10/18/12 11:13 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: >> Hi, >> I have recently started to update the users guide on special >> functions, providing accuracy measurements of our implementations. >> To get these figures, I carried out extensive comparisons with

Re: [math] Validation of special functions

2012-10-19 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Phil, thanks for your answer. 2012/10/19 Phil Steitz : > On 10/18/12 11:13 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: >> Hi, >> I have recently started to update the users guide on special >> functions, providing accuracy measurements of our implementations. >> To get these figures, I carried out extensive c

Re: [math] Validation of special functions

2012-10-19 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/18/12 11:13 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > Hi, > I have recently started to update the users guide on special > functions, providing accuracy measurements of our implementations. > To get these figures, I carried out extensive comparisons with > reference values computed with Maxima, and 128

[math] Validation of special functions

2012-10-18 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi, I have recently started to update the users guide on special functions, providing accuracy measurements of our implementations. To get these figures, I carried out extensive comparisons with reference values computed with Maxima, and 128 decimal digits. I also wrote a Java command-line app to a