On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 01:28:30PM +0200, Sebastien Brisard wrote:
> Hello there,
> this discussion is now a JIRA ticket (MATH-613).
> Have a look and let me know what you think. I'm happy to take care of this if
> you all agree on the proposal.
+1
Gilles
Hello there,
this discussion is now a JIRA ticket (MATH-613).
Have a look and let me know what you think. I'm happy to take care of this if
you all agree on the proposal.
Sebastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 05:06:38AM +0200, Sebastien Brisard wrote:
> Ted,
> Mahout seems to be fairly large (!). What classes should I look at more
> specifically?
If not done already, you could also have a look at class
o.a.c.m.analysis.FunctionUtils
(in CM).
Gilles
-
AbstractMatrix
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Sebastien Brisard wrote:
> Ted,
> Mahout seems to be fairly large (!). What classes should I look at more
> specifically?
> Thanks!
> Sebastien
>
> >The Colt package used a functional style to implement what you suggest.
> > This approach has been i
Ted,
Mahout seems to be fairly large (!). What classes should I look at more
specifically?
Thanks!
Sebastien
>The Colt package used a functional style to implement what you suggest.
> This approach has been inherited by Mahout.
> The basic idea is that there is an assign method that takes other a
It sounds similar to the trove approach, but I couldn't say with certainty.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Sebastien Brisard <
sebastien.bris...@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> That sounds interesting. I was thinking of something like mapping a
> bivariate
> function to two vectors, but was afraid
That sounds interesting. I was thinking of something like mapping a bivariate
function to two vectors, but was afraid of performance issues. Your feedback
on this is encouraging!
As for the approach used in Mahout, is it similar to the "Procedure"s in GNU
Trove? It takes a little bit of time to gra
The Colt package used a functional style to implement what you suggest.
This approach has been inherited by Mahout.
The basic idea is that there is an assign method that takes other arguments
and a function for combining the arguments. The function allows great
amounts of flexibility and promote
Hello.
> in Blas, the method DAXPY can lead to very compact code. As far as I know, it
> has no equivalent in RealVector. There are a few method called ToSelf,
> which modify the calling vector, instead of returning a new one, but these are
> restricted to scalars operating on vectors.
> In ot
Le 07/07/2011 10:31, Sebastien Brisard a écrit :
Hi,
Hi Sébastien,
in Blas, the method DAXPY can lead to very compact code. As far as I know, it
has no equivalent in RealVector. There are a few method called ToSelf,
which modify the calling vector, instead of returning a new one, but thes
Hi,
in Blas, the method DAXPY can lead to very compact code. As far as I know, it
has no equivalent in RealVector. There are a few method called ToSelf,
which modify the calling vector, instead of returning a new one, but these are
restricted to scalars operating on vectors.
In other words, the
11 matches
Mail list logo
