On 9/7/11 11:20 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
> 2011/9/7 Phil Steitz :
>> On 9/6/11 8:58 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
>>> 2011/9/6 Phil Steitz :
On 9/6/11 12:00 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
> 2011/9/5 Phil Steitz :
>> I have a couple of proposals for this class:
>>
>
2011/9/7 Phil Steitz :
> On 9/6/11 8:58 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
>> 2011/9/6 Phil Steitz :
>>> On 9/6/11 12:00 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
2011/9/5 Phil Steitz :
> I have a couple of proposals for this class:
>
> 0) Merge the interface and impl. This is consistent wi
On 9/6/11 8:58 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
> 2011/9/6 Phil Steitz :
>> On 9/6/11 12:00 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
>>> 2011/9/5 Phil Steitz :
I have a couple of proposals for this class:
0) Merge the interface and impl. This is consistent with what we
are doing in so
2011/9/6 Phil Steitz :
> On 9/6/11 12:00 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
>> 2011/9/5 Phil Steitz :
>>> I have a couple of proposals for this class:
>>>
>>> 0) Merge the interface and impl. This is consistent with what we
>>> are doing in some other places where we have only one implementation.
>
On 9/6/11 12:00 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
> 2011/9/5 Phil Steitz :
>> I have a couple of proposals for this class:
>>
>> 0) Merge the interface and impl. This is consistent with what we
>> are doing in some other places where we have only one implementation.
> Fine with me.
>> 1) Extend th
2011/9/5 Phil Steitz :
> I have a couple of proposals for this class:
>
> 0) Merge the interface and impl. This is consistent with what we
> are doing in some other places where we have only one implementation.
Fine with me.
> 1) Extend this class to actually provide a distribution - i.e.
> imple
I have a couple of proposals for this class:
0) Merge the interface and impl. This is consistent with what we
are doing in some other places where we have only one implementation.
1) Extend this class to actually provide a distribution - i.e.
implement the Distribution interface.
2) make the ke
