Hi,
>
>>
>> Before closing the issue, I'd like to commit the "test" I've attached to
>> MATH-784. It's not really a "unit" test (as it doesn't "assert" anything
>> yet) but it shows the meaning of "sigma".
>> I've ended the class name with the string "TestValidation" so that it does
>> not run by d
Hi Gilles,
>
> Before closing the issue, I'd like to commit the "test" I've attached to
> MATH-784. It's not really a "unit" test (as it doesn't "assert" anything
> yet) but it shows the meaning of "sigma".
> I've ended the class name with the string "TestValidation" so that it does
> not run by d
> > [...]
> > For clarity's sake (design-wise), I propose to remove the
> > "guessParametersErrors" method, and add a "getSigma" (as syntactic sugar).
> >
> I'm OK with that. As a first step, we deprecate it, and stipulate in
> the javadoc that getSigma() should be used instead. We emphasize that
>
2012/5/4 Gilles Sadowski :
> Hello.
>
>> I'm obviously missing something in my litterature review. I did a new
>> MC simulation, with a much smaller number of observation points
>> (namely 3, to fit a straight line!!!). It turns out that the formula
>> you are advocating for is the best estimate o
Hello.
> I'm obviously missing something in my litterature review. I did a new
> MC simulation, with a much smaller number of observation points
> (namely 3, to fit a straight line!!!). It turns out that the formula
> you are advocating for is the best estimate of the standard deviation
> of the
