That's fine. I think raw use of reflection might make the tests pretty
complicated, but the idea is reasonable.
Jmockit allows mocking of static methods (I have used it to mock
System.nanoTime(), for instance). By using a partial mock class, you can
gain access to private methods as well.
On Th
Hi,
2012/11/27 Gilles Sadowski
> Hello.
>
> > > [...]
> > Actually, I would like the methods to be tested, so they cannot be
> > private. That's the reason why I made them package private.
>
> You can indirectly test them by passing appropriate arguments to the public
> methods that use them. P
Hello.
> > [...]
> Actually, I would like the methods to be tested, so they cannot be
> private. That's the reason why I made them package private.
You can indirectly test them by passing appropriate arguments to the public
methods that use them. Please do not select a visibility scope just for t
Hi,
2012/11/27 Gilles Sadowski
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:22:26AM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 11/27/12 6:42 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:24:26AM -0800, Ted Dunning wrote:
> > >> Actually, I would still recommend checks. You may know what the code
> does
>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:15:13AM -0800, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> I can only say from my own experience that people make mistakes over time and
> having the code warn them when that happens is a good thing.
>
> Your experience may be different but I have to admit that I have done some
> pretty
I can only say from my own experience that people make mistakes over time and
having the code warn them when that happens is a good thing.
Your experience may be different but I have to admit that I have done some
pretty silly things along the lines of forgetting to follow some constraint.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:22:26AM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/27/12 6:42 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:24:26AM -0800, Ted Dunning wrote:
> >> Actually, I would still recommend checks. You may know what the code does
> >> now, but you can't trust either yourself o
On 11/27/12 6:42 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:24:26AM -0800, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> Actually, I would still recommend checks. You may know what the code does
>> now, but you can't trust either yourself or somebody else in the future.
>> Better to do the checks.
> I don't
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:24:26AM -0800, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Actually, I would still recommend checks. You may know what the code does
> now, but you can't trust either yourself or somebody else in the future.
> Better to do the checks.
I don't agree because in this case, the situation is akin
Actually, I would still recommend checks. You may know what the code does
now, but you can't trust either yourself or somebody else in the future.
Better to do the checks.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> Then the answer would be: no
> ch
Hello.
> > > in classes Gamma and Beta, some functions are package private:
> > > - logGammaSum
> > > - logGammaMinusLogGammaSum (for lack of a better name)
> > > - bcorr
> > > These functions are meant to be used by other functions,
> >
> > None of these functions seem to used. Am I missing
Hi,
2012/11/26 Gilles Sadowski
> Hi.
>
> > in classes Gamma and Beta, some functions are package private:
> > - logGammaSum
> > - logGammaMinusLogGammaSum (for lack of a better name)
> > - bcorr
> > These functions are meant to be used by other functions,
>
> None of these functions seem
Hi.
> in classes Gamma and Beta, some functions are package private:
> - logGammaSum
> - logGammaMinusLogGammaSum (for lack of a better name)
> - bcorr
> These functions are meant to be used by other functions,
None of these functions seem to used. Am I missing something?
Gilles
> like l
Hi,
in classes Gamma and Beta, some functions are package private:
- logGammaSum
- logGammaMinusLogGammaSum (for lack of a better name)
- bcorr
These functions are meant to be used by other functions, like logBeta. Each
of these functions have their own domain, and in logBeta, we make sure no
14 matches
Mail list logo
