ok
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/6/13 7:27 AM, Ajo Fod wrote:
> > Is this an issue then?
>
> Best not to top-post. Lets see if we get any other views on how the
> setup may be improved. Then when we have consensus that a design
> change is warranted and what that
On 8/6/13 7:27 AM, Ajo Fod wrote:
> Is this an issue then?
Best not to top-post. Lets see if we get any other views on how the
setup may be improved. Then when we have consensus that a design
change is warranted and what that change will be, we can open a
ticket to track the work.
Phil
>
> -Ajo
Is this an issue then?
-Ajo
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/2/13 3:09 PM, Ajo Fod wrote:
> > The class design of AbstractStorelessStats (Storeless) suggests that it
> is
> > storing data in its parent AbstractUnivariate (Parent) and there are
> > methods accesible to
On 8/2/13 3:09 PM, Ajo Fod wrote:
> The class design of AbstractStorelessStats (Storeless) suggests that it is
> storing data in its parent AbstractUnivariate (Parent) and there are
> methods accesible to a child of this class that shouldn't be to something
> that is storeless in:
>
> private doubl
The class design of AbstractStorelessStats (Storeless) suggests that it is
storing data in its parent AbstractUnivariate (Parent) and there are
methods accesible to a child of this class that shouldn't be to something
that is storeless in:
private double[] storedData;
... perhaps Percentile etc s
