On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 15:21, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 2:03 PM Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> > I thought Commons Logging 1.2 required Java 1.2? Big leap to 8!
> >
>
> The current POM requires Java 6.
>
I must have confused that with the prior release then which is Java 1.1 I
think
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 2:03 PM Matt Sicker wrote:
> I thought Commons Logging 1.2 required Java 1.2? Big leap to 8!
>
The current POM requires Java 6.
Gary
>
> Same bias here for Log4j2, though adding simple default methods like that
> would be neat for any APIs stuck using it (like Spring F
I thought Commons Logging 1.2 required Java 1.2? Big leap to 8!
Same bias here for Log4j2, though adding simple default methods like that
would be neat for any APIs stuck using it (like Spring Framework for
example).
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 14:52, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi Balazs,
>
> To me, as a
Hi Balazs,
To me, as a biased contributor to Apache Log4j 2, I think the Log4j API
should be new facade to use instead of Commons Logging.
That said, please feel free to contribute PRs to Commons Logging for those
using that API ;-)
https://github.com/apache/commons-logging
Gary
On Tue, Nov 13
Hi,
I am wondering to extend the org.apache.commons.logging.Log interface with
default methods.
It could simplify the usage, instead of
if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
log.debug("something heavy " + here);
}
could use lambda expression
log.debug(() -> "something heavy " + here);
to pre
