On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:00 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
>
>> Gary,
>>
>> In this case, we're dealing with a veto to a code modification, which
>> is allowed. Here's the information with respect to code modification
>> vetoes (http://www.apach
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:00 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> Gary,
>
> In this case, we're dealing with a veto to a code modification, which
> is allowed. Here's the information with respect to code modification
> vetoes (http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto):
>
> "A code-modification pro
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:19 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 25 February 2012 14:05, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Because we are using (still) some Java 6 code for this recent
>> contribution.
>>
>> > Ready, set, ... go?
>>
>> -1
>>
>> Completely unnece
Gary,
In this case, we're dealing with a veto to a code modification, which
is allowed. Here's the information with respect to code modification
vetoes (http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto):
"A code-modification proposal may be stopped dead in its tracks by a
-1 vote by a qualified
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:19 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 25 February 2012 14:05, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Right now, in trunk, we have:
> >
> > DescriptionResourcePathLocationType
> > The method getInstance(Locale) is undefined for the type
> > DateFormatSymbolsFastDateParser.java
>
