+1 agreed. I think that there is a usefulness in both cases Matt
mentions. May I also suggest that the interface be named EventSource
instead of EventSupport, so as to avoid confusion with the
EventListenerSupport class and better identify the class as being a
source of events.
-Michael
On Mon, J
I think adding the EventSupport interface still has value; as mentioned before,
some type that needs to support > 1 listener type can still implement
EventSupport and this is more valuable than having no interface
whatsoever with which to manipulate the object's listeners.
The primary differenc
