Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

Hi Simo Thanks for confirming. Very much appreciated. Regards Felix Am 06.03.2013 um 16:16 schrieb Simone Tripodi: > Hi Felix! > > indeed, we are putting effort on NOT breaking the backwards > compatibility with 1.2.X, we updated to version 1.3 - due to some APIs > update - and I personally pl

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

Hi Felix! indeed, we are putting effort on NOT breaking the backwards compatibility with 1.2.X, we updated to version 1.3 - due to some APIs update - and I personally planned to cut the next release keeping that version, so projects like Struts, Sling, ... could adopt it without feeling pain :) T

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

Hi, Am 06.03.2013 um 14:56 schrieb Simone Tripodi: > And, just for the sake of putting more steaks on the barbeque, the > bundle-plugin takes care of adjusting the version in the MANIFEST.MF > according to the SemVer recommendations; version is now 1.3-SNAPSHOT > and look below how the MANIFEST.M

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

And, just for the sake of putting more steaks on the barbeque, the bundle-plugin takes care of adjusting the version in the MANIFEST.MF according to the SemVer recommendations; version is now 1.3-SNAPSHOT and look below how the MANIFEST.MF has been generated. alles gute! -Simo $ cat target/osgi/M

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

2013/3/6 Felix Meschberger > Hi, > > Am 06.03.2013 um 12:51 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > > 2013/3/6 sebb > > > >> On 6 March 2013 08:53, Simone Tripodi wrote: > > Is there anybody that can suggest how to handle that situation? > > Create new methods which return long rather than i

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

Hi, Am 06.03.2013 um 12:51 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > 2013/3/6 sebb > >> On 6 March 2013 08:53, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Is there anybody that can suggest how to handle that situation? Create new methods which return long rather than int; deprecate the old >> methods.

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

On 6 March 2013 11:51, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2013/3/6 sebb > >> On 6 March 2013 08:53, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> >>> Is there anybody that can suggest how to handle that situation? >> >> >> >> Create new methods which return long rather than int; deprecate the old >> methods. >> >> >> >> e.g.

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

2013/3/6 sebb > On 6 March 2013 08:53, Simone Tripodi wrote: > >>> Is there anybody that can suggest how to handle that situation? > >> > >> Create new methods which return long rather than int; deprecate the old > methods. > >> > >> e.g. > >> > >> @Deprecated > >> public int getContentLength()

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

>> that should be enough to bump to 1.3.0 since there are APIs addition - >> do you agree? > > Yes, except it should be 1.3, not 1.3.0. > If a point release is then required, it is 1.3.1, but point releases > are fairly rare. OK thanks :) http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetrip

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

On 6 March 2013 08:53, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> Is there anybody that can suggest how to handle that situation? >> >> Create new methods which return long rather than int; deprecate the old >> methods. >> >> e.g. >> >> @Deprecated >> public int getContentLength() { ... } >> >> /** >> * @since x.

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

>> Is there anybody that can suggest how to handle that situation? > > Create new methods which return long rather than int; deprecate the old > methods. > > e.g. > > @Deprecated > public int getContentLength() { ... } > > /** > * @since x.x > */ > > public long getLongContentLength() { ... } > or

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

On 5 March 2013 15:46, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi again Gergo, > > patch looks OK to me, the problem we would have ATM is the backward > compatibility, since there methods signature change. > > Is there anybody that can suggest how to handle that situation? Create new methods which return long ra

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

Hi again Gergo, patch looks OK to me, the problem we would have ATM is the backward compatibility, since there methods signature change. Is there anybody that can suggest how to handle that situation? TIA, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http:

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

Hi Gergo, > I've finished my patch for 2Gb+ uploads. > Since I don't use portlets, it needs some additional fix for portlets (it's > not broken, just returns -1 as the total size of the file, when it's over > 2Gb. > > Gergo very good, thanks, since I am doing some work on [fileupload], I am revie

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files - DONE

Dear all! I've finished my patch for 2Gb+ uploads. Since I don't use portlets, it needs some additional fix for portlets (it's not broken, just returns -1 as the total size of the file, when it's over 2Gb. Gergo see https://github.com/pihentagy/commons-fileupload/commit/16a677dd3c61acde530a5f54a