hahaha thanks!
BTW I really hope there will be another chance to come back in charge
with this proposal :)
Have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Simone Tripodi
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Matt!!!
> I noticed 2 important points I'd like to discuss:
>
> 1) generally speaking, the bigger part of the users are lazy: they
> just want to grab latest released artifact of XXX component with Maven
> and use it, so it is hard to obt
Hi Matt!!!
I noticed 2 important points I'd like to discuss:
1) generally speaking, the bigger part of the users are lazy: they
just want to grab latest released artifact of XXX component with Maven
and use it, so it is hard to obtain feedbacks from APIs not released
yet;
2) committers/PMCs intere
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> looks like there's not enough activity/interest on new Digester, I
> suggest to suspend this topic for a while and come speaking about it
> until there will be interest from the users.
> Thanks to all that took part of the dis
Hi all guys,
looks like there's not enough activity/interest on new Digester, I
suggest to suspend this topic for a while and come speaking about it
until there will be interest from the users.
Thanks to all that took part of the discussion!
All the best, have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache
Hi all,
thanks for the trust guys!!! I won't express my vote, it would be too
incorrect IMHO. I'll keep my finger crossed to see at least the 3
consensus :)
Have a nice weekend!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Matt Benson wr
On Mar 19, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 3/19/11 4:54 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> Hi Rahul,
>>> thanks once again for the wise suggestions, much more than appreciated!
>>>
>>> I underestimated the importance of the users o
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/19/11 4:54 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Rahul,
>> thanks once again for the wise suggestions, much more than appreciated!
>>
>> I underestimated the importance of the users over the active
>> developers, so I totally agree with you, mo
Before the release we should improve the unit test coverage. A
migration guide with step by step help would be a nice addition.
Gary
On Mar 16, 2011, at 14:31, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all mates!!!
> I need your support on advising our users that a new version of
> Digester is available on sa
Hi Phil!!!
thanks for you feedbacks!!! Sure, there's no rush, let's do things
taking the needed time :)
Have a nice weekend, all the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/19/11 4:54 AM, Simone Tripo
On 3/19/11 4:54 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> thanks once again for the wise suggestions, much more than appreciated!
>
> I underestimated the importance of the users over the active
> developers, so I totally agree with you, moving to dormant is
> premature.
>
> I was aware about breakin
Hi Rahul,
thanks once again for the wise suggestions, much more than appreciated!
I underestimated the importance of the users over the active
developers, so I totally agree with you, moving to dormant is
premature.
I was aware about breaking APIs compatibility, since we had to face
the same prob
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all mates!!!
> I need your support on advising our users that a new version of
> Digester is available on sandbox, I already sent more than once an
> email on users ML but never got a reply, maybe my name is not so
> influent between user
Hi all mates!!!
I need your support on advising our users that a new version of
Digester is available on sandbox, I already sent more than once an
email on users ML but never got a reply, maybe my name is not so
influent between users or maybe the Digester is not so popular as I
still think... but
Hi Rahul,
sorry if I'm late, unfortunately I got distracted by other stuff :P
I uploaded the Digester3 documentation in the Sandbox site space[1],
and added a (poor, maybe) page[2] about differences between Digester
and Digester3.
Feel free to ping me whenever you want for clarifications!!!
Have a
Hi Rahul!!!
sure of course, I'll prepare a special section on the documentation to
see a Digester->Digester3 migration scenario, so that also users can
know pros and cons.
Thanks for your support!
have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Mar
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Good morning all guys,
> in the last month I've invested my spare time on redesigning a new
> potential version of the Digester component in Sandbox, according to
> what I proposed time ago on dev ML[1].
> The experiment is complete at 95%,
Thanks again for your feedbacks Matt, much more than appreciated! :)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2011, at 10:22 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 1 March 2011 15:55, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> Hi Seb!
>>
On Mar 1, 2011, at 10:22 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 1 March 2011 15:55, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Seb!
>> thanks a lot for your hints too, very appreciated!
>>
>> Something suggests me to remove the @SuppressWarnings because
>> ClassCastException are admitted, let's suppose I have the given XML:
>>
Hi Seb,
I think you provided an excellent feedback, I can follow the path you
just showed me and
* add the warning in the parse() method;
* provide an aux method, something like checkedParse() that takes the
Class in input and performs the check once document has been parsed.
On a side note, I'
On 1 March 2011 15:55, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Seb!
> thanks a lot for your hints too, very appreciated!
>
> Something suggests me to remove the @SuppressWarnings because
> ClassCastException are admitted, let's suppose I have the given XML:
>
>
> text
>
>
> that can be mapped to
>
> class
Hi Seb!
thanks a lot for your hints too, very appreciated!
Something suggests me to remove the @SuppressWarnings because
ClassCastException are admitted, let's suppose I have the given XML:
text
that can be mapped to
class A {
String prop;
}
if a user tries to map to a different type
On 1 March 2011 08:00, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Simone,
>
> Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
>> @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
>> public T parse(InputSource input, Class returnedType) throws
>> IOException, SAXException {
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> return returnedType.cast(this.root);
>> }
>
> It
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hello Jorg,
> absolutely, thanks a lot for your feedback too, very appreciated!
Point taken, +1.
Matt
> Have a nice day,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:00 AM, J
Hello Jorg,
absolutely, thanks a lot for your feedback too, very appreciated!
Have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Hi Simone,
>
> Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
>> @SuppressWarnings("u
Hi Simone,
Simone Tripodi wrote:
[snip]
> @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
> public T parse(InputSource input, Class returnedType) throws
> IOException, SAXException {
> .
> .
> .
> return returnedType.cast(this.root);
> }
It would be nice, if we can start to avoid such method global suppre
Hi Matt!!!
thanks a lot for your feedbacks, you know I never consider them as $0.02 :)
To reply to your question: I'm sure it is possible adapting the
Module/EDLS over the existing Digester, adapting the existing
configuration layer, but the core conceptual difference is that the
current Digester
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
>
> Good morning all guys,
> in the last month I've invested my spare time on redesigning a new
> potential version of the Digester component in Sandbox, according to
> what I proposed time ago on dev ML[1].
> The experiment is complete at 95%
Good morning all guys,
in the last month I've invested my spare time on redesigning a new
potential version of the Digester component in Sandbox, according to
what I proposed time ago on dev ML[1].
The experiment is complete at 95%, is not of course a release but
there are enough tests/samples/docs
29 matches
Mail list logo
