Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-11-13 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all, Rahul, > any news about the issue[1]? I know (I follow the ML) you're very busy > so I don't want to disturb you in any way. > As I previously said, I strongly believe in that feature that I'm > available on continuing to work on it

Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-11-13 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all, Rahul, any news about the issue[1]? I know (I follow the ML) you're very busy so I don't want to disturb you in any way. As I previously said, I strongly believe in that feature that I'm available on continuing to work on it to release it. Please let me know, best regards!!! Simone On Sun,

Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-10-11 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all commons folks, any interest in the community about this new digester feature? Best regards and have a nice sunday!!! Simone On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Rahul, > thanks a lot, as you maybe already noticed, the JIRA issue was just created > > https://issues.apa

Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-10-08 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Rahul, thanks a lot, as you maybe already noticed, the JIRA issue was just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIGESTER-135 I'm available for any kind of question. Best regards!!! Simone On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Simone

Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-10-07 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi again, > I'm ready also to submit the patch, I added the documentation in the > package.html according to the other packages documentation. > I'm waiting for news, just let me know how to proceed :) JIRA away, no need to wait to proceed

Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-10-07 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > > Hi Rahul, > I just sent via fax my signed copy of ICLA, I received the OK reply, > please let me know if > you received it successfully. Yes, it has been received and recorded. -Rahul > Thanks in advance, best regards!!! > Simone > >

Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-10-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi again, I'm ready also to submit the patch, I added the documentation in the package.html according to the other packages documentation. I'm waiting for news, just let me know how to proceed :) Best regards Simone >> its receipt by the ASF Secretary. I'll confirm when its received and >> the

Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-10-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
> Also, could you fill out an Individual Contributor License Agreement > (ICLA) for this (and subsequent patches)? That is here -- the fax > number is on the form itself, you can mail it in too if you want: > >  http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt > > This is needed before we can accept (and by

Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-10-06 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Rahul, thanks a lot, your help is very appreciated. I'll send you the ICLA asap and later I'll attach the patch to a new JIRA issue. Thanks a lot once again, best regards!!! Simone On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Simone Tripodi > wrote:

Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-10-05 Thread Tommaso Teofili
Hi all, I am new to the ML although I've been using Apache Commons for several years, I just read about this proposal and it seems promising to me. It could make Digester even simpler to use. I did not have the time to go much deep inside the code but the idea is very interesting in my opinion. Reg

Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-10-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all folks, Rahul, > during the weekend I checked-out the commons-digester from trunk and > imported my work in, I'm ready to submit a patch throught Jira. > The patch includes the runtime interpreter and a set of 7 test cases, > using simp

Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-10-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all folks, Rahul, during the weekend I checked-out the commons-digester from trunk and imported my work in, I'm ready to submit a patch throught Jira. The patch includes the runtime interpreter and a set of 7 test cases, using simple java objects and more comples graph objects. I could add also

Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-10-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Rahul, very nice to meet you and thanks for your kind reply :) On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi all commons folks!!! >> I've been happily using the digester package since the 1.6 release, I >> found it very e

Re: [digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-10-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all commons folks!!! > I've been happily using the digester package since the 1.6 release, I > found it very easy to use and absolutely one of the best way to parse > quickly XML documents and mapping them to Java objects :) > > Even if us

[digester] extension annottaion proposal

2009-10-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all commons folks!!! I've been happily using the digester package since the 1.6 release, I found it very easy to use and absolutely one of the best way to parse quickly XML documents and mapping them to Java objects :) Even if using the XML rule declaration, or coding Digester rules, is absolut