Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 12/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> sebb wrote: > >> > On 11/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> >> Phil Steitz wrote: > >> >> > Posting the last failed build output while it is, umstill > available: > >> > > >> > I assume thi

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-12 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 12/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > On 11/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> > Posting the last failed build output while it is, umstill >> available: >> > >> > I assume this is from: >> > >> > >> http://vmbuild.apache.org/cont

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 11/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> Phil Steitz wrote: > >> > Posting the last failed build output while it is, umstill > available: > > > > I assume this is from: > > > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-12 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 11/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> Phil Steitz wrote: >> > Posting the last failed build output while it is, umstill available: > > I assume this is from: > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267625&projectId=22 > >> > >> > Multithread test t

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-11 Thread sebb
On 11/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: > > Posting the last failed build output while it is, umstill available: I assume this is from: http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267625&projectId=22 > > > > Multithread test time = 489 ms. Threads: 20. L

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-11 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: > Posting the last failed build output while it is, umstill available: > > Multithread test time = 489 ms. Threads: 20. Loops: 20. Hold time: > 200. Maxwait: 100. Done: 11. Did not run: 0. Failed: 9. expectError: > true > StartupDelay: 0. ConnectTime: 3. Runtime: 203. Loops:

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-11 Thread Phil Steitz
Posting the last failed build output while it is, umstill available: Multithread test time = 489 ms. Threads: 20. Loops: 20. Hold time: 200. Maxwait: 100. Done: 11. Did not run: 0. Failed: 9. expectError: true StartupDelay: 0. ConnectTime: 3. Runtime: 203. Loops: 1. State: Done. thrown: null.

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> sebb wrote: >> >> > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> >> sebb wrote: >> >> >> > Thanks. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I a

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread sebb
On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> sebb wrote: > >> > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> >> sebb wrote: > >> >> > Thanks. > >> >> > > >> >> > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the > >> >> >

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> sebb wrote: >> >> > Thanks. >> >> > >> >> > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the >> >> > loopOnce parameter to PoolTest. >> >> >> >> I think I foun

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread sebb
On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> sebb wrote: > >> > Thanks. > >> > > >> > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the > >> > loopOnce parameter to PoolTest. > >> > >> I think I found (and fixed) another p

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > Thanks. >> > >> > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the >> > loopOnce parameter to PoolTest. >> >> I think I found (and fixed) another problem. See r897720. > > The wait in question is purely to

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread sebb
On 10/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > Thanks. > > > > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the > > loopOnce parameter to PoolTest. > > I think I found (and fixed) another problem. See r897720. The wait in question is purely to allow the threads to star

[dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-10 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > Thanks. > > Looks like I did not complete the fixes properly when I added the > loopOnce parameter to PoolTest. I think I found (and fixed) another problem. See r897720. > > It was quite tricky following the Continuum build output, as the date > was 2 days behind, and the mail fo