That sounds good to me too. The less duplication, the better.
Gary
On Aug 14, 2013, at 18:16, James Carman wrote:
> I would say we should extract the conversion stuff out of [beanutils]
> and create [convert] (with some modifications to the API perhaps) an
> have [beanutils] use the new compone
I would say we should extract the conversion stuff out of [beanutils]
and create [convert] (with some modifications to the API perhaps) an
have [beanutils] use the new component.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Two weeks ago, I mentioned that BeanUtils and Convert heavily
Two weeks ago, I mentioned that BeanUtils and Convert heavily overlap. Some
others agreed. Do we want to fold one project into the other? Or can we
find justification to have 2 separate conversion projects?
--
Cheers,
Paul
