> >> That certainly doesn't prevent anybody else from trying to find a
> >> compromise :-)
>
> > It feels like Optionals could be a compromise.
>
> I must admit I've lost track of the later discussion threads. If you
> mean that we'd return Optional<> results, this would become an entirely
> differ
On 2021-07-01, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> That certainly doesn't prevent anybody else from trying to find a
>> compromise :-)
> It feels like Optionals could be a compromise.
I must admit I've lost track of the later discussion threads. If you
mean that we'd return Optional<> results, this would be
> That certainly doesn't prevent anybody else from trying to find a
> compromise :-)
>
It feels like Optionals could be a compromise.
Hi all
there isn't a single option that hasn't at least received two -1s with
eight people indicating their preference. So neither option seems to be
an option that could lead to a compromise.
With this I run out of ideas and will rest my case and not try to find a
generic solution - but rather t
