Anyone against classscan?
Thanks,
Chas
On 4/20/12 8:21 AM, "Matt Benson" wrote:
>Agreed; there are any number of things the PMC needs to agree upon
>here. WRT the name: trying to reconstruct the past, I think Mark and
>I must have just agreed offline to call the community work [classscan]
>b
evaluate the options and do proper
benchmarking.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Matt Benson
> To: Commons Developers List
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 5:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [classpath,meiyo]
>
> Agreed; there are any number of things the PM
Agreed; there are any number of things the PMC needs to agree upon
here. WRT the name: trying to reconstruct the past, I think Mark and
I must have just agreed offline to call the community work [classscan]
based on his "classscanner" name. I lean here, but could possibly be
persuaded to [classp
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Honton, Charles wrote:
> I've submitted an ICLA and company has submitted CCLA. I see next steps
> as:
>
> 1. Agree on name: meiyo or classpath? (Or something else?)
>
Please pick a name that makes it obvious, not meiyo, classpath is OK, we
can/should have a
I've submitted an ICLA and company has submitted CCLA. I see next steps as:
1. Agree on name: meiyo or classpath? (Or something else?)
2. Agree on package name.
3. Create source repository.
4. Move code from GitHub (https://github.com/chonton/meiyo-sandbox)
5. Give major contributo
