2012/7/26 Bruno P. Kinoshita :
>
>
>>
>> From: Benedikt Ritter
>>To: Commons Developers List
>>Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2012 3:28 PM
>>Subject: Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID
>>
>>2012/7/26 sebb :
>>> On 26
; -Elijah
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Bruno P. Kinoshita
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> From: Benedikt Ritter
>>>To: Commons Developers List
>>>Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2012 3:28 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [chain2]
sday, 26 July 2012 3:28 PM
>>Subject: Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID
>>
>>2012/7/26 sebb :
>>> On 26 July 2012 18:29, Brent Worden wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>>> On 25 July 2012 07:54, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>>
>
> From: Benedikt Ritter
>To: Commons Developers List
>Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2012 3:28 PM
>Subject: Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID
>
>2012/7/26 sebb :
>> On 26 July 2012 18:29, Brent Worden wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012
2012/7/26 sebb :
> On 26 July 2012 18:29, Brent Worden wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 25 July 2012 07:54, Jörg Schaible wrote:
sebb wrote:
> On 24 July 2012 09:11, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Elijah,
>>
>> Elijah Zupancic wrote:
>>
>>>
On 26 July 2012 18:29, Brent Worden wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 25 July 2012 07:54, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> sebb wrote:
>>>
On 24 July 2012 09:11, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Elijah,
>
> Elijah Zupancic wrote:
>
>> Thanks Jörg!
>>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 25 July 2012 07:54, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 24 July 2012 09:11, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Elijah,
Elijah Zupancic wrote:
> Thanks Jörg!
>
> It sounds like we will need to change them all in chai
On 25 July 2012 07:54, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>> On 24 July 2012 09:11, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> Hi Elijah,
>>>
>>> Elijah Zupancic wrote:
>>>
Thanks Jörg!
It sounds like we will need to change them all in chain because we
have changed the package name.
>>>
>>> W
sebb wrote:
> On 24 July 2012 09:11, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Elijah,
>>
>> Elijah Zupancic wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Jörg!
>>>
>>> It sounds like we will need to change them all in chain because we
>>> have changed the package name.
>>
>> Well, since they are all different objects now, the Java run
On 24 July 2012 09:11, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Elijah,
>
> Elijah Zupancic wrote:
>
>> Thanks Jörg!
>>
>> It sounds like we will need to change them all in chain because we
>> have changed the package name.
>
> Well, since they are all different objects now, the Java runtime will not
> try to ma
Hi Elijah,
if you need a introduction to serialization, I recommend to read the
corresponding chapters in Effective Java by Josh Blooch [1].
Regards,
Benedikt
[1]
http://www.amazon.com/Effective-Java-Edition-Joshua-Bloch/dp/0321356683/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1343119885&sr=8-1&keywords=effective+
Hi Elijah,
Elijah Zupancic wrote:
> Thanks Jörg!
>
> It sounds like we will need to change them all in chain because we
> have changed the package name.
Well, since they are all different objects now, the Java runtime will not
try to match them anyway, so it is for this special case not really
Thanks Jörg!
It sounds like we will need to change them all in chain because we
have changed the package name.
-Elijah
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Hi Elijah
>
> Elijah Zupancic wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Now that we have changed the chain API to not be backwards
Hi Elijah
Elijah Zupancic wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that we have changed the chain API to not be backwards compatible
> in the 2.0 release, should we change the version number in the
> serialVersionUID fields as well? It seems to me that would make sense,
> but I'm a bit of a newbie when it
Hi everyone,
Now that we have changed the chain API to not be backwards compatible
in the 2.0 release, should we change the version number in the
serialVersionUID fields as well? It seems to me that would make sense,
but I'm a bit of a newbie when it comes to managing their versions. I
was wonderi
15 matches
Mail list logo
