Re: [chain][v2] updated clirr report

2011-09-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Seb, thanks a lot for your feedbacks!!! All Clirr errors you can see on the report - except the `retrieve` added method in the Context interface - are strictly related to internal data structures/class fields, that were initially made as protected so, as checkstyle suggested, I reduced the visi

Re: [chain][v2] updated clirr report

2011-09-04 Thread Matt Benson
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:02 PM, sebb wrote: > On 4 September 2011 20:04, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Hi all guys, >> the clirr report has just been updated on my personal ASF space[1], >> can you review please? > > As it stands, 2.0 is not strictly binary compatible with 1.2. > > However, it depends

Re: [chain][v2] updated clirr report

2011-09-04 Thread sebb
On 4 September 2011 20:04, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > the clirr report has just been updated on my personal ASF space[1], > can you review please? As it stands, 2.0 is not strictly binary compatible with 1.2. However, it depends whether the changes affect the published API, or are in

[chain][v2] updated clirr report

2011-09-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, the clirr report has just been updated on my personal ASF space[1], can you review please? I think it's time to call a vote to accept the current branch as the trunk, WDYT? Many thanks in advance, have anice day! Simo [1] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.htm