Gary,
I just built the SNAPSHOT locally and tested against my production
scenarios and all is good!
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:03 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The pull-up refactoring and adjusted tests are now in git master.
> Pease verify your use cases if any.
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Sep 1
Hi All,
The pull-up refactoring and adjusted tests are now in git master.
Pease verify your use cases if any.
Gary
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 8:00 AM Melloware Inc wrote:
>
> +1 for Gary's second option as well.
>
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 3:47 AM Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 31 Aug 2024
+1 for Gary's second option as well.
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 3:47 AM Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 at 20:45, Dávid Szigecsán wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > While I'm still getting familiar with things here, I'd like to share my
> > thoughts on this issue. In my view, version 2.0 typical
On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 at 20:45, Dávid Szigecsán wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While I'm still getting familiar with things here, I'd like to share my
> thoughts on this issue. In my view, version 2.0 typically signifies a break
> in backward compatibility, which makes the second solution—changing the
> supertyp
Hi,
While I'm still getting familiar with things here, I'd like to share my
thoughts on this issue. In my view, version 2.0 typically signifies a break
in backward compatibility, which makes the second solution—changing the
supertype's behavior—acceptable. Given the existence of BeanUtilsBean2 and
Hi All,
I want us to decide what we want for 2.0 with the classes
BeanUtilsBean2 vs BeanUtilsBean, and ConvertUtilsBean2 vs
ConvertUtilsBean.
For your convenience:
-
https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils2/BeanUtilsBean2.java
-
https:/
